VA claims guide
VA Claim Denied? How to Choose Between a Supplemental Claim, Higher-Level Review and Board Appeal
Got a VA denial? Compare a Supplemental Claim, Higher-Level Review and Board Appeal, the one-year deadline, and how to keep your original effective date.
Calls are answered by an automated intake assistant and may be recorded with your consent.
A denial letter from the VA is not the end of a claim. If the decision was dated on or after February 19, 2019, federal law gives you three ways to ask the VA to look again: a Supplemental Claim, a Higher-Level Review, or a Board Appeal. Each one fits a different situation, and choosing the wrong one can cost you time. This guide explains what each option does, the deadlines that matter, and how to pick the one that fits your denial. For the broader overview of what a denial means, start with our denied claim page; this post is the decision aid that comes after it.
This is general information, not legal advice. Free help choosing is available from an accredited Veterans Service Organization (VSO), and the VA's own pages linked below are the final word on current forms and procedures.
Start with the date on your decision letter
The most important date in a denied claim is the date printed on the decision letter. Under 38 C.F.R. § 3.2500, you generally have one year from the date VA issued notice of the decision to choose a Higher-Level Review or a Board Appeal. The VA's own pages say the one-year period starts from the date on your decision letter, not the date it reached you.
A Supplemental Claim is different: you can file one at any time after a decision. But the one-year mark still matters for a second reason, described next.
Why the one-year mark protects your back pay
The effective date of an award decides how far back your monthly payments reach. Under 38 C.F.R. § 3.2500(h), if you continuously pursue a claim, meaning you file one of the review options within one year of each decision, the effective date is generally set by the date of your original claim (or the date entitlement arose, whichever is later). If you let more than a year pass before filing, that continuous pursuit is broken, and a later grant may be effective only from the date of the new filing.
In practical terms: a Supplemental Claim filed 11 months after a denial can still reach back to your original claim date, while the same Supplemental Claim filed 14 months after the denial generally cannot. If you are close to the deadline, file something first and refine it later. Our effective date and back pay page covers the other effective-date rules, such as Intent to File and clear and unmistakable error.
The three options at a glance
| Supplemental Claim | Higher-Level Review | Board Appeal | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Best when | You have new and relevant evidence, or a change in law applies | You think the VA made an error on the evidence already in your file | You want a Veterans Law Judge to decide |
| New evidence allowed? | Yes (required, unless based on a change in law) | No | Only on the Evidence Submission and Hearing dockets |
| Deadline to keep your effective date | 1 year from the decision | 1 year from the decision | 1 year from the decision |
| VA's published goal | About 125 days on average | About 125 days on average | 365 days (Direct), 550 days (Evidence), 730 days (Hearing) |
| Form | VA Form 20-0995 | VA Form 20-0996 | VA Form 10182 |
The processing goals above come from the VA's decision review pages and Board Appeals page. They are goals, not promises, and real wait times change, so check the VA site for current figures.
Option 1: Supplemental Claim (you have something new)
Choose a Supplemental Claim if you have new and relevant evidence that the VA did not have when it denied the claim, or if the law has changed in a way that covers your condition. The VA explains that "new" means information it has not considered before, and "relevant" means information that proves or disproves something in your claim. See the VA's Supplemental Claims page.
Examples the VA itself gives include a new medical report linking your service-connected injury to another condition, or a buddy (lay) statement from someone who witnessed the event that caused your disability. A Supplemental Claim can also be based on a change in law, such as the PACT Act's new presumptive conditions. If you served in a covered location and have a presumptive condition, you generally do not need to prove that service caused it.
Two cautions:
- A Supplemental Claim without new and relevant evidence, and without a change in law, is not complete. Do not re-file the same evidence and hope for a different answer.
- If your condition has simply gotten worse, the VA says to file a claim for increased compensation rather than a Supplemental Claim.
Option 2: Higher-Level Review (you think the VA got it wrong)
Choose a Higher-Level Review if you believe the decision contains an error or a difference of opinion that would change the outcome, and you have no new evidence. A more senior reviewer looks at the same record again. You cannot submit new evidence, and you can ask for a one-time informal conference to point out specific errors, although the VA notes that this may delay the review. See the VA's Higher-Level Review page.
Know the limits before you pick this lane:
- You must request it within one year of the decision on an initial claim or a Supplemental Claim.
- You cannot request a Higher-Level Review after a previous Higher-Level Review or Board Appeal on the same issue.
- It is not available for contested claims.
Typical fits are an exam the VA seems to have misread, a service record the reviewer overlooked, or a regulation that was applied incorrectly. If the real problem is that your file is missing medical evidence, a Higher-Level Review will not fix that.
Option 3: Board Appeal (you want a judge)
A Board Appeal sends your case to a Veterans Law Judge at the Board of Veterans' Appeals. Under the VA's description, you can request one within one year of a decision on an initial claim, Supplemental Claim or Higher-Level Review, and you pick one of three dockets:
- Direct Review. The judge decides on the evidence already in your file. No new evidence and no hearing. The Board's goal is 365 days.
- Evidence Submission. You can add new evidence with your appeal or within 90 days of the date the VA receives your request. The Board's goal is 550 days.
- Hearing. You meet with the judge by virtual tele-hearing, videoconference, or in person in Washington, D.C. New evidence can be submitted at the hearing or within 90 days afterward. The Board's goal is 730 days.
The Board is usually the slowest lane, so it makes the most sense when the issue turns on a legal question, when you want to explain your case in person, or when earlier reviews were unsuccessful. You cannot request two Board Appeals in a row for the same claim. For simultaneously contested claims, the deadline is shorter: 60 days from the decision letter.
Rules that apply to every option
- One at a time. Under 38 C.F.R. § 3.2500(b), while one review is pending on an issue you generally cannot file a different review option on that same issue. You may be able to withdraw and switch within the one-year window.
- Where each decision can lead. After a Higher-Level Review decision, you can file a Supplemental Claim or a Board Appeal. After a Board decision, you can file a Supplemental Claim or appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims.
- Court deadline. A notice of appeal to that court must be filed within 120 days after the Board decision notice is issued, under 38 U.S.C. § 7266.
- Each issue is separate. A decision letter often covers several conditions. You can pursue some and leave others, so read each issue carefully.
A simple way to choose
- Read the decision letter. Write down the date and the stated reason for each denied issue. Common reasons include no current diagnosis, no in-service event, or no link (nexus) between the two.
- Ask whether the file is missing something. If the reason points to missing evidence, such as a diagnosis, treatment records or a medical opinion, a Supplemental Claim is usually the better fit.
- Ask whether the VA made a mistake on what it had. If the evidence was there and was misread or a rule was misapplied, consider a Higher-Level Review or a Board Appeal.
- Consider timing. Higher-Level Reviews and Supplemental Claims are targeted at about 125 days, and the Board's goals run from one year to two years. If you need a faster decision and have new evidence, that favors a Supplemental Claim.
- Mark the one-year date on a calendar, and do not wait for the last week to start.
If you want the full detail on each path after you have chosen, our appeal options page walks through them. If your claim was granted but you think the rating is too low, that is a different situation, covered on our rating too low page.
If you are unsure, the VA offers a short decision review options tool that asks a few questions and suggests the options that fit.
Get help before you file
An accredited attorney, claims agent, or VSO representative can help you request a decision review, and VSO help is free. You can read more on our free help, appeal options and denied claim pages. VA Disability Help is a marketing service, not a law firm, and does not give legal advice. If you would like your decision reviewed, use the form below and your request will be reviewed by Milberg, PLLC. Submitting a request does not create an attorney-client relationship, and no outcome is guaranteed.
Sources
- VA decision reviews and appeals, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
- Choosing a decision review option, VA.gov
- Supplemental Claims, VA.gov
- Higher-Level Reviews, VA.gov
- Board Appeals, VA.gov
- 38 C.F.R. § 3.2500, Review of decisions
- 38 U.S.C. § 7266, Notice of appeal
See if a law firm can review your VA decision
Takes about 2 minutes. There is no charge to request a review.